Article on Scottish anti-porn law in The Register
The Register has posted an article today pointing out some of the more ridiculous aspects of Scotland’s new extreme porn bill:
The proposal was much as expected; similar to the English version, but slightly more extreme. However, unlike the English version, which avoided the trap of appearing to criminalise pictures of people flogging a dead horse — by criminalising sado-masochism or bestiality or necrophilia — Scottish legislators have walked straight into it, seeking to make it illegal to own pictures of anyone having sex with an animal carcass.
The Scottish law could potentially criminalise a greater number of people than the English law because, unlike its English counterpart, it doesn’t take consent into account at all:
The other area in which the Scottish law plays fast and loose with the concept of consent is in respect of “rape or other non-consensual penetrative sexual activity”. The key point here is that even if it was actually consensual, an image will be illegal if it looks non-consensual or if it appears to show harm.
Opposition to the Scottish law has been encouragingly fierce - let’s hope it has some effect.

